Welkom op het expertplatform!
Dit platform verschaft informatie en kennis omtrent de WL expertisedomeinen 'hydraulica en sediment', 'havens en waterwegen', 'waterbouwkundige constructies', 'waterbeheer' en 'kustbescherming' - gaande van WL medewerkers met hun expertise, het curriculum van deze instelling, tot publicaties, projecten, data (op termijn) en evenementen waarin het WL betrokken is.
Het WL onderschrijft het belang van "open access" voor de ontsluiting van haar onderzoeksresultaten. Lees er meer over in ons openaccessbeleid.
| one publication added to basket [210769] |
Sampling methods for amphipods of Posidonia oceanica meadows: a comparative study
Michel, L.; Lepoint, G.; Dauby, P.; Sturaro, N. (2010). Sampling methods for amphipods of Posidonia oceanica meadows: a comparative study. Crustaceana 83(1): 39-47. dx.doi.org/10.1163/156854009X454630
In: Crustaceana. Brill Academic Publishers: Leiden; Köln; New York; Boston. ISSN 0011-216X; e-ISSN 1568-5403
|  |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Michel, L.
- Lepoint, G.
- Dauby, P.
- Sturaro, N.
|
|
|
| Abstract |
Efficient sampling of amphipod crustaceans associated with Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile meadows is difficult, due to their complex community structure and to the heterogeneity of the meadows. Here we compare three sampling techniques: the hand-towed net, the air-lift, and light traps.
Each of the methods shows specific advantages and disadvantages, hence the most important feature to consider in the choice of the method would be its adequacy with regard to the study purpose. Moreover, the most accurate way to sample amphipods from P. oceanica meadows could be to combine several methods, keeping in mind their respective strengths and weaknesses, and to adapt the sampling protocol to the aims of the study at issue. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
