Total wave power absorption by a multi-float wave energy converter and a semi-submersible wind platform with a fast far field model for arrays
Stansby, P.; Carpintero-Moreno, E.; Draycott, S.; Stallard, T. (2022). Total wave power absorption by a multi-float wave energy converter and a semi-submersible wind platform with a fast far field model for arrays. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy 8(1): 43-63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40722-021-00216-9
In: Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy. Springer: New York. ISSN 2198-6444; e-ISSN 2198-6452, more
|   |
| Keyword |
|
| Author keywords |
Multi-float wave energy converter; Semi-sub wind platform; Total wave power absorption; Radiated wave power; Array model |
| Authors | | Top |
- Stansby, P.
- Carpintero-Moreno, E., more
- Draycott, S.
- Stallard, T.
|
|
|
| Abstract |
Wave energy converters absorb wave power by mechanical damping for conversion into electricity and multi-float systems may have high capture widths. The kinetic energy of the floats causes waves to be radiated, generating radiation damping. The total wave power absorbed is thus due to mechanical and radiation damping. A floating offshore wind turbine platform also responds dynamically and damping plates are generally employed on semi-submersible configurations to reduce motion, generating substantial drag which absorbs additional wave power. Total wave power absorption is analysed here by linear wave diffraction–radiation–drag models for a multi-float wave energy converter and an idealised wind turbine platform, with response and mechanical power in the wave energy case compared with wave basin experiments, including some directional spread wave cases, and accelerations compared in the wind platform case. The total power absorption defined by capture width is input into a far field array model with directional wave spreading. Wave power transmission due a typical wind turbine array is only reduced slightly (less than 5% for a 10 × 10 platform array) but may be reduced significantly by rows of wave energy converters (by up to about 50%). |
|
