Skip to main content
Publications | Persons | Institutes | Projects
[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [289349]
Analyzing changes in sediment meiofauna communities using the image analysis software ZooImage
Lindgren, J.F.; Hassellöv, I.-M.; Dahllöf, I. (2013). Analyzing changes in sediment meiofauna communities using the image analysis software ZooImage. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 440: 74-80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.12.001
In: Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. Elsevier: New York. ISSN 0022-0981; e-ISSN 1879-1697, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Keywords
    Environmental Managers & Monitoring
    Fisheries > Gear/Technology
    Industry
    Marine Sciences
    Marine Sciences > Marine Sciences General
    Others
    Scientific Community
    Scientific Publication
    Software/Modelling Tool
    Marine/Coastal
Author keywords
    Community response; Image analysis; Meiofauna; Sediment; ZooImage

Project Top | Authors 
  • Association of European marine biological laboratories, more

Authors  Top 
  • Lindgren, J.F.
  • Hassellöv, I.-M.
  • Dahllöf, I.

Abstract
    We here propose a novel method of automatic classification of higher taxa from benthic meiofaunal communities using the image analysis software ZooImage. Meiofauna was extracted from sediment at five sites at different depths in the Gullmar Fjord on the Swedish west-coast, and digitalized through scanning. The resulting images were analyzed with the image analysis software, by comparing them to a reference image library of meiofaunal groups of higher taxa, as well as non-faunal groups consisting of different types of debris. The accuracy of the analyses was tested using ZooImage internal cross-validation method, and by comparing digitalized samples from the different sites with manually classified samples. The internal validation accuracy (82-93%) was comparable to prior published studies on zooplankton. The largest errors in classification were within the non-faunal groups and accuracy for classification of faunal groups was as high as 93%. Misclassification within the faunal groups was mainly due to either too few images of some classes in the training set, or to when fauna could not be sufficiently separated from debris in the images used for the library, causing interference in the learning algorithm. Comparison with manual classification confirmed the errors revealed in the internal cross-validation. Statistical analysis revealed differences in the meiofauna communities between different depths as well as a temporal change.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors