| one publication added to basket [354444] | Fuel subsidies to fisheries globally: Magnitude and impacts on resource sustainability
Sumaila, U.R.; Teh, L.; Watson, R.; Tyedmers, P.; Pauly, D. (2006). Fuel subsidies to fisheries globally: Magnitude and impacts on resource sustainability, in: Sumaila, U.R. et al. Catching more bait: a bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies. pp. 38-48
In: Sumaila, U.R.; Pauly, D. (Ed.) (2006). Catching more bait: a bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies. Fisheries Centre Research Reports, 14(16). The Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia: Vancouver. 114 pp., more
In: Fisheries Centre Research Reports. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia: Vancouver. ISSN 1198-6727, more
|   |
| Authors | | Top |
- Sumaila, U.R.
- Teh, L.
- Watson, R.
|
- Tyedmers, P.
- Pauly, D., more
|
|
| Abstract |
It is generally accepted that global fisheries are grossly overcapitalized, resulting in overfishing in most of the world’s fisheries. Fuel prices have recently seen significant increases. Given that fuel constitutes asignificant component of fishing costs, it is obvious that, other things being equal, increasing fuel prices will reduce overcapacity and overfishing, because they will reduce the profits that can be made, therebydriving marginal fishers out of fishing. But, other things are hardly equal. Here, the willingness of governments to provide the fishing sector fuel subsidies reduce, if not completely negate, the conservationvalue of increasing fuel costs. The objective of this contribution is twofold. First, we explore the theoretical basis for the expectation that increasing fuel price faced by fishing enterprises will, everything being equal, reduce fishing pressure. Second, we estimate the amount of fuel subsidies (defined narrowly here as the price differential between what others and fishers pay in an economy) paid to the fishing sector bygovernments globally. Results from our study indicate that global fuel subsidies stand at between US$ 6±2 billion per year. This implies that, depending on how much of this subsidy existed before the fuel priceincrease, fishing enterprises can, in the aggregate, absorb as much as this amount of increase in their fuel budget before we begin to see any conservation benefits from fuel price increases. |
|
