Skip to main content
Publications | Persons | Institutes | Projects
[ report an error in this record ]basket (1): add | show Print this page

one publication added to basket [362537]
Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach
Harrison, P.A.; Dunford, R.; Barton, D.N.; Kelemen, E.; Martín-López, B.; Norton, L.; Termansen, M.; Saarikoski, H.; Hendriks, K.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Czúcz, B.; García-Llorente, M.; Howard, D.; Jacobs, S.; Karlsen, M.; Kopperoinen, L.; Madsen, A.; Rusch, G.; Van Eupen, M.; Verweij, P.; Smith, R.; Tuomasjukka, D.; Zulian, G. (2018). Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach. Ecosystem Services 29(Part C): 481-498. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016
In: Ecosystem Services. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISSN 2212-0416, more
Peer reviewed article  

Available in  Authors 

Authors  Top 
  • Harrison, P.A.
  • Dunford, R.
  • Barton, D.N.
  • Kelemen, E.
  • Martín-López, B.
  • Norton, L.
  • Termansen, M.
  • Saarikoski, H.
  • Hendriks, K.
  • Gómez-Baggethun, E.
  • Czúcz, B.
  • García-Llorente, M.
  • Howard, D.
  • Jacobs, S., more
  • Karlsen, M.
  • Kopperoinen, L.
  • Madsen, A.
  • Rusch, G.
  • Van Eupen, M.
  • Verweij, P.
  • Smith, R.
  • Tuomasjukka, D.
  • Zulian, G.

Abstract
    A range of methods are available for assessing ecosystem services. Methods differ in their aims; from mapping and modelling the supply and demand of ecosystem services to appraising their economic and non-economic importance through valuation techniques. Comprehensive guidance for the selection of appropriate ecosystem service assessment methods that address the requirements of different decision-making contexts is lacking. This paper tackles this gap using the experience from 27 case studies which applied different biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary valuation methods to operationalise the ecosystem service concept towards sustainable land, water and urban management. A survey of the reasons why the case study teams selected particular methods revealed that stakeholder-oriented reasons, such as stakeholder participation, inclusion of local knowledge and ease of communication, and decision-oriented reasons, such as the purpose of the case study and the ecosystem services at stake, were key considerations in selecting a method. Pragmatic reasons such as available data, resources and expertise were also important factors. This information was used to develop a set of linked decision trees, which aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners in choosing ecosystem service assessment methods that are suitable for their context.

All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors