Publications | Persons | Institutes | Projects
[ report an error in this record ]basket (0): add | show Print this page
Flood modeling for risk evaluation: a MIKE FLOOD vs. SOBEK 1D2D benchmark study
Vanderkimpen, P.; Melger, E.; Peeters, P. (2008). Flood modeling for risk evaluation: a MIKE FLOOD vs. SOBEK 1D2D benchmark study, in: Samuels, P. et al. (2009). Proceedings of the European Conference on Flood Risk Management Research into Practice (FLOODRISK 2008), Oxford, UK, 30 September - 2 October 2008: Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice. pp. 77-84
In: Samuels, P.; Huntington, S.; Harrop, J. (Ed.) (2009). Proceedings of the European Conference on Flood Risk Management Research into Practice (FLOODRISK 2008), Oxford, UK, 30 September - 2 October 2008: Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice. Taylor & Francis: London. ISBN 978-0-415-48507-4. XXI, 309 + cd-rom pp., more
Available in  Authors 
Document type: Conference paper
Keywords
    Control > Flood control
    Flood predictions
    Hazards > Weather hazards > Floods
    Modelling
    Models > Scale models > Hydraulic models
Authors  Top 
  • Vanderkimpen, P., more
  • Melger, E.
  • Peeters, P., more
Abstract
    The flood risk for a section of the Belgian coastal plain was evaluated by means of two similar flood modeling packages: MIKE FLOOD and SOBEK 1D2D. The submodels and processes available in both packages were matched as closely as possible. Subsequently, the impact of the software package on hydraulics, flood damage and flood risk was quantified. The results from both packages agree well. Some differences occur, but these can easily be explained as a result of unavoidable minor differences in concepts and implementation. The uncertainty associated with the selection of either software package is insignificant compared to other sources of uncertainty.
All data in the Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) is subject to the VLIZ privacy policy Top | Authors