Assessment of PRISMA water reflectance using autonomous hyperspectral radiometry
Braga, F.; Fabbretto, A.; Vanhellemont, Q.; Bresciani, M.; Giardino, C.; Scarpa, G.M.; Manfè, G.; Concha, J.A.; Brando, V.E. (2022). Assessment of PRISMA water reflectance using autonomous hyperspectral radiometry. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 192: 99-114. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.08.009
In: Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV: Amsterdam. ISSN 0924-2716; e-ISSN 1872-8235, more
|   |
| Keywords |
Marine/Coastal; Fresh water |
| Author keywords |
Imaging spectroscopy; Autonomous hyperspectral radiometer systems; Coastal and inland waters; Atmospheric correction; PRISMA mission |
| Authors | | Top |
- Braga, F.
- Fabbretto, A.
- Vanhellemont, Q., more
|
- Bresciani, M.
- Giardino, C.
- Scarpa, G.M.
|
- Manfè, G.
- Concha, J.A.
- Brando, V.E.
|
| Abstract |
Hyperspectral remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) derived from PRISMA in the visible and infrared range was evaluated for two inland and coastal water sites using above-water in situ reflectance measurements from autonomous hyper- and multispectral radiometer systems. We compared the Level 2D (L2D) surface reflectance, a standard product distributed by the Italian Space Agency (ASI), as well as outputs from ACOLITE/DSF, now adapted for processing of PRISMA imagery. Near-coincident Sentinel-3 OLCI (S3/OLCI) observations were also compared as it is a frequent data source for inland and coastal water remote sensing applications, with a strong calibration and validation record. In situ measurements from two optically diverse sites in Italy, equipped with fixed autonomous hyperspectral radiometer systems, were used: the REmote Sensing for Trasimeno lake Observatory (RESTO), positioned in a shallow and turbid lake in Central Italy, and the Acqua Alta Oceanographic Tower (AAOT), located 15 km offshore from the lagoon of Venice in the Adriatic Sea, which is characterised by clear to moderately turbid waters. 20 PRISMA images were available for the match-up analysis across both sites. Good performance of L2D was found for RESTO, with the lowest relative (Mean Absolute Percentage Difference, MAPD < 25%) and absolute errors (Bias < 0.002) in the bands between 500 and 680 nm, with similar performance for ACOLITE. The lowest median and interquartile ranges of spectral angle (SA < 8°) denoted a more similar shape to the RESTO in situ data, indicating pigment absorption retrievals should be possible. ACOLITE showed better statistical performance at AAOT compared to L2D, providing R2 > 0.5, Bias < 0.0015 and MAPD < 35%, in the range between 470 and 580 nm, i.e. in the spectral range with highest reflectances. The addition of a SWIR based sun-glint correction to the default atmospheric correction implemented in ACOLITE further improved performance at AAOT, with lower uncertainties and closer spectral similarity to the in situ measurements, suggesting that ACOLITE with glint correction was able to best reproduce the spectral shape of in situ data at AAOT. We found good results for PRISMA Rrs retrieval in our study sites, and hence demonstrated the use of PRISMA for aquatic ecosystem mapping. Further studies are needed to analyse performance in other water bodies, over a wider range of optical properties. |
|
