Welkom op het expertplatform!
Dit platform verschaft informatie en kennis omtrent de WL expertisedomeinen 'hydraulica en sediment', 'havens en waterwegen', 'waterbouwkundige constructies', 'waterbeheer' en 'kustbescherming' - gaande van WL medewerkers met hun expertise, het curriculum van deze instelling, tot publicaties, projecten, data (op termijn) en evenementen waarin het WL betrokken is.
Het WL onderschrijft het belang van "open access" voor de ontsluiting van haar onderzoeksresultaten. Lees er meer over in ons openaccessbeleid.
| one publication added to basket [337991] |
Comparative study on ship motions in waves based on two time domain boundary element methods
In: Engineering Analysis With Boundary Elements. Elsevier SCI Ltd: Oxford. ISSN 0955-7997; e-ISSN 1873-197X
|  |
| Trefwoord |
|
| Author keywords |
Transient free surface Green's function; Rankine higher-order boundary element method; Ship hydrodynamics; Ship motion in waves; Time domain |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Mei, T.-L.
- Zhang, T.
- Candries, M.
|
|
|
| Abstract |
This paper presents a comparative study on the motions of a ship advancing in waves using two different three-dimensional time domain boundary element methods: a Transient Free surface Green's Function (TFGF) method and a Rankine Higher Order Boundary Element Method (HOBEM). Three models based on the HOBEM are also considered to identify the dominant factors affecting the accuracy of solutions: (i) the N–K model using Neumann–Kelvin (N–K) linearization, (ii) the N–K+DB model using the N–K linearization for the free surface boundary conditions and the double-body (DB) m-terms in the body boundary condition, (iii) the Rankine HOBEM based on DB linearization. The Wigley I and the Series 60 (CB = =0.7) are taken as study objects. The comparisons show that the Rankine HOBEM based on DB linearization is generally more accurate than the Rankine HOBEM with other two models and the TFGF method. The hydrodynamic coefficients are mainly affected by the m-terms, especially at low frequencies; while the influences of different linearizations of the free surface boundary conditions are negligible. Both the m-terms and the leading terms of steady velocity potential reserved in the free surface boundary conditions are important for motion responses, while the influence of the former is stronger than the latter. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
