Essential fish habitat and marine reserves: Proceedings of the 2nd William R. and Lenore Mote International Symposium in Fisheries Ecology, November 4-6, 1998, Sarasota, Florida
Coleman, F.C.; Travis, J.; Thistle, A.B. (Ed.) (2000). Essential fish habitat and marine reserves: Proceedings of the 2nd William R. and Lenore Mote International Symposium in Fisheries Ecology, November 4-6, 1998, Sarasota, Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science, 66(3). Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences: Miami. 525-1009 pp.
Deel van: Bulletin of Marine Science. University of Miami Press: Coral Gables. ISSN 0007-4977; e-ISSN 1553-6955, meer
Bevat:Agardy, T.S. (2000). Information needs for marine protected areas: scientific and societal. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 875-888, meer
Bohnsack, J.A. (2000). A comparison of the short-term impacts of no-take marine reserves and minimum size limits. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 635-650, meer
Chiappone, M.; Sullivan Sealy, K.M. (2000). Marine reserve design criteria and measures of success: lessons learned from the Exuma Cays Land and Sea Park, Bahamas. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 691-705, meer
Collins, M.R.; Rogers, S.G.; Smith, T.I.J.; Moser, M.L. (2000). Primary factors affecting sturgeon populations in the Southeastern United States: fishing mortality and degradation of essential habitats. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 917-928, meer
Conover, D.O.; Travis, J.; Coleman, F.C. (2000). Essential Fish Habitat and Marine Reserves: an introduction to the second Mote Symposium in Fisheries Ecology. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 527-534, meer
Crowder, L.B.; Lyman, S.J.; Figueira, W.F.; Priddy, J. (2000). Source-sink population dynamics and the problem of siting marine reserves. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 799-820, meer
Dahlgren, C.P.; Sobel, J. (2000). Designing a Dry Tortugas Ecological Reserve: how big is big enough? …To do what? Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 707-719, meer
Dayton, P.K.; Sala, E.; Tegner, M.J.; Thrush, S. (2000). Marine reserves: parks, baselines, and fishery enhancement. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 617-634, meer
Eklund, A.-M.; McClellan, D.B.; Harper, D.E. (2000). Black grouper aggregations in relation to protected areas within the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 721-728, meer
Guénette, S.; Pitcher, T.J.; Walters, C.J. (2000). The potential of marine reserves for the management of northern cod in Newfoundland. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 831-852, meer
Koenig, C.C.; Coleman, F.C.; Grimes, C.B.; Fitzhugh, G.R.; Scanlon, K.M.; Gledhill, C.T.; Grace, M. (2000). Protection of fish spawning habitat for the conservation of warm-temperate reef-fish fisheries of shelf-edge reefs of Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 593-616, meer
Lindeman, K.C.; Pugliese, R.; Waugh, G.T.; Ault, J.S. (2000). Developmental patterns within a multispecies reef fishery: management applications for essential fish habitats and protected areas. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 929-956, meer
Mangel, M. (2000). Trade-offs between fish habitat and fishing mortality and the role of reserves. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 663-674, meer
Martell, S.J.D.; Walters, C.J.; Wallace, S.S. (2000). The use of marine protected areas for conservation of lingcod ( Ophiodon elongatus). Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 729-743, meer
Milon, J.W. (2000). Pastures, fences, tragedies and marine reserves. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 901-916, meer
Murawski, S.A.; Brown, R.; Lai, H.-L.; Rago, P.J.; Hendrickson, L. (2000). Large-scale closed areas as a fishery-management tool in temperate marine systems: the Georges Bank experience. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 775-798, meer
Nowlis, J.S. (2000). Short- and long-term effects of three fishery-management tools on depleted fisheries. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 651-662, meer
Peterson, C.H.; Summerson, H.C.; Thomson, E.; Lenihan, H.S.; Grabowski, J.; Manning, L.M.; Micheli, F.; Johnson, G. (2000). Synthesis of linkages between benthic and fish communities as a key to protecting essential fish habitat. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 759-774, meer
Pitcher, T.; Watson, R.; Haggan, N.; Guénette, S.; Kennish, R.; Sumaila, U.R.; Cook, D.; Wilson, K.; Leung, A. (2000). Marine reserves and the restoration of fisheries and marine ecosystems in the South China Sea. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 543-566, meer
Rieser, A. (2000). Essential fish habitat as a basis for marine protected areas in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 889-899, meer
Roberts, C.M. (2000). Selecting marine reserve locations: optimality versus opportunism. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 581-592, meer
Rosenberg, A.A.; Bigford, T.E.; Leathery, S.; Hill, R.L.; Bickers, K. (2000). Ecosystem approaches to fishery management through essential fish habitat. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 535-542, meer
Simberloff, D. (2000). No reserve is an island: marine reserves and nonindigenous species. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 567-580, meer
St. Mary, C.M.; Osenberg, C.W.; Frazer, T.K.; Lindberg, W.J. (2000). Stage structure, density dependence and the efficacy of marine reserves. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 675-690, meer
Stockhausen, W.T.; Lipcius, R.N.; Hickey, B.M. (2000). Joint effects of larval dispersal, population regulation, marine reserve design, and exploitation on production and recruitment in the caribbean spiny lobster. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 957-990, meer
Trexler, J.C.; Travis, J. (2000). Can marine protected areas restore and conserve stock attributes of reef fishes? Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 853-873, meer
Walters, C.J. (2000). Impacts of dispersal, ecological interactions, and fishing effort dynamics on efficacy of marine protected areas: how large should protected areas be? Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 745-757, meer
Warner, R.R.; Swearer, S.E.; Caselle, J.E. (2000). Larval accumulation and retention: implications for the design of marine reserves and essential fish habitat. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66(3): 821-830, meer
|  |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Coleman, F.C., redacteur
- Travis, J., redacteur
- Thistle, A.B., redacteur
|
|
|
| Abstract |
(Preface to the proceedings)The use of marine reserves as a fisheries management tool to enhance stocks and protect habitat has gained considerable support from scientists, environmental groups, and the public. The support for their use is born of frustration with more conventional approaches, which have failed to stop the decline of fisheries stocks worldwide. The essential fish habitat provisions in the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act ( 1996) provide the legal means of using marine reserves as a management tool in the United States, and the Marine Sanctuaries Act (1972) provided comparable means for protecting unique habitats. The science to support the use of reserves has received strong criticism from extractive users, however, and as a result, the political will to move forward with this tool has been lacking. The second William R. and Lenore Mote International Symposium in Fisheries Ecology is dedicated to examining these criticisms, addressing the interface between essential habitat and marine reserves, and determining the suite of situations in which marine reserves work best both within and outside of the broader management arena. |
|
